The legal tech boom is here – and it’s not slowing down. The global legal tech market is set to double by 2030 (Grand View Research), and AI adoption has surged in legal departments over the past year. But there’s a snag. While investment soars, success rates remain stubbornly low.

According to McKinsey, only 30% of digital transformations actually hit the mark. For first-time contract lifecycle management (CLM) tools, half are expected to fail (eDiscoveryToday, Whatfix). That’s a lot of cash – and hope – down the drain.

So what separates the legal teams who unlock 300% ROI from those left with shelfware and frustration?

Let’s dive into the data and see what really works.

Legal tech adoption is up – but the cracks are showing

From spend management to AI-powered assistants, legal departments are experimenting like never before. Some of the standout stats:

• 83% use e-billing and spend tools – the highest-rated tech for value delivered (CLOC 2025).
• 76% now use generative AI weekly – up from 38% last year (Clio).
• 69% have adopted document and legal research tools (SimpleLegal).
• 59% use CLM systems (Lawyers Weekly).

But for all that uptake, only 25% of legal departments are considered “digitally ready” (Gartner).

The ROI is real – if you get it right

When legal tech works, it really works.

• CLM tools can deliver up to 450% ROI (Concord).
• Document automation slashes creation time by 80%.
• Modern platforms cut contract approval time by 82%.
• Lawyers save an average of 10 hours per week – worth over £80,000 annually at typical internal rates.

Yet despite these gains, 65% of legal leaders say their tech isn’t delivering value. And 63% struggle to prove ROI (Harvard Law School Forum). Why? Because the tech alone doesn’t solve the problem.

What’s really going wrong?

Let’s be blunt: most legal tech failures aren’t about bad software. They’re about people.

Top five stumbling blocks:

• Training and adoption – 78% of legal teams say this is the hardest part (FTI Consulting).
• Lawyer resistance – 54% face pushback rooted in autonomy, urgency bias, and scepticism.
• Skills gaps – 54% say their team lacks the technical know-how (Intellek).
• Integration headaches – 58% struggle to link new tools with legacy systems (Innovative Computing Systems).
• Lack of support – 70% admit they need external help but try to DIY anyway (FTI Consulting).

Sound familiar? You’re not alone. But help is out there – and the lessons from success stories are clear.

The best tech isn’t always the flashiest – it’s the best implemented

CLM systems are a prime example. They're widely adopted – but often frustrating. A full implementation can take 3–6 months for advanced platforms like Ironclad or DocuSign CLM.

What helps?

• Phased rollouts – 45% higher success rate than all-at-once “big bang” launches (Concord).
• E-billing platforms – show the highest satisfaction, with five vendors dominating 60% of the market and delivering cost-control wins (SimpleLegal).
• AI tools – 79% of lawyers use them, but only 22% tie usage to performance metrics (Wolters Kluwer).

Legal leaders are spending – but wisely

Budgets are tight, but tech spend is rising. Gartner predicts legal tech investment will double by 2027. Right now:

• 45% of Chief Legal Officers plan new tech purchases (ACC).
• 65% expect to invest more in AI (Lexology).
• 57% cite tech automation as a top cost-control strategy (Thomson Reuters).
• 82% expect workloads to increase, while 42% face cost-cutting targets (CLOC, Legal Dive).

Want to beat the odds? Focus on people, not just platforms

The standout success stories have a few things in common:

• They build realistic roadmaps, not grand plans with no buy-in.
• They invest in change management – 20–30% of the project budget (CCB Journal).
• They prioritise user experience over bells and whistles.

And they understand lawyer psychology - we all know that lawyers need autonomy, proof, and speed. So, involve them early, show quick wins, and adoption improves dramatically.

Ignore culture, and you risk joining the 70% failure club (Park IP).

Final thought

Legal tech can be transformative – but it’s not magic. Tools won’t fix a broken process, and software won’t shift culture alone.

To avoid becoming another 70% statistic, legal leaders need to treat transformation as a team sport. That means planning carefully, supporting consistently, and remembering that the humans using the tech matter just as much as the tech itself.

And if that sounds like a big ask? It is. But get it right, and the payoff is huge – not just in ROI, but in time saved, frustration avoided, and value delivered.

‍